The
streets in
many
neighbourhoods don’t have sidewalks or pathways.
Why? Cost – I’m told.
But if we’re short of funds, why are so many streets wide enough
for
two lanes of traffic plus parking on each side? Or – put another
way…why do we offer free parking in residential areas?
The answer is so simple that I’m surprised that it took me so long to
ask the question.
The reason I took so long to ask the question is that I – like everyone
else was brought up in the age of car culture. No… more than car
culture – car entitlement. We assume that providing every possible
convenience for car owners is just a given. That everyone would support
it. That we all benefit – so it’s all good.
But as soon as you ask the question you start to see it from a
different angle.
Who is paying for these two extra lanes of asphalt? (Not just building
it, but snow clearing and maintenance.) All
of us, of course. And who uses the asphalt? Well the guests
of the property owners, and increasingly, the property owners
themselves. Why enlarge your driveway to accommodate your three-vehicle
lifestyle when the city gives you free parking?
On one short street near us one owner, who runs a Lawn Care business,
routinely parks at least one of his work vehicles on the street.
Everyone uses and everyone pays – right?
Well no … just car owners use that asphalt. Pedestrians don’t use
it. So why don’t the people who use cars pay for
their parking spots? Why do I get to pay?
Well of course this is just one of a thousand ways in which we support,
subsidize and encourage car use. I live in a condo – in an area with no
reasonably close on-street parking. We have to provide visitor parking
for our guests. We have to pay for it while my taxes go to paying for
visitor parking for homeowners who are richer than I am.
That’s it in a nutshell.
The solution. Well, take that four-lane street. Divide it down the
middle. Assign one side for cars and one side for bikes and
pedestrians (Did I mention that, like so many of our streets, there is
no
sidewalk. Then I get to use it when I drive and when I walk or bike.
Let the property owners provide parking for their excess vehicles and
guests – the way I already do for mine.
Tax fairness and environmental action – all in one – at a fairly low
cost to the taxpayer. The real cost will be for the ones who use
the parking. Why is that not fair?
We haven’t even begun to seriously discourage car culture. We could
start by stopping the subsidization of the destruction of our planet in
a hundred little ways.
**For a serious examination of this issue check out the work of Donald
Shoup, the author of "The High Cost of Free Parking".
|